Analytics

Lost in the mutual funds maze? Try the FundScope Way

Manager Value-Added: a recipe for success

Mutual Fund Reports: new and updated

Tax-Smart Investing: Portfolio Diagnostics as a tax planning tool

Family Affairs: check out the sponsor before you buy the fund.

Outside the Box: If you read the articles featured in this section, you will never look at mutual funds the same way again.

Have you looked at it from that angle?

We all know that, other things being equal, higher MER means lower returns.  But did you know that it also means high risk?

Imagine that you’re a portfolio manager. You’re in charge of a fund with a 3% MER. Your chief rival is at the helm of a fund with a 1% MER. Because your fees are higher than your rival’s, you need an extra 2% of returns to reach similar results.

 How will you do this? By taking more risk. The table below shows how funds with a higher MER have, on average, a higher risk (measured by standard deviation).   What the table demonstrates is that if you, as an investor, have a low tolerance for risk, you should stay away from high cost funds. Do not count on your fund company to bring this situation to your attention.

Smart investors pay close attention to the connection between risk and reward.   In most cases, high risk means high reward, and vice versa.  But people who invest in high cost funds have the worst of both worlds: they spend more, for the dubious privilege of having a riskier asset.  That does not make much sense.

Table III-Canadian equity funds: Relationship between Risk and Cost

Quartile	MER	Average Standard Deviation (3 years)
Bottom	2%	14.4%
Second Last	2.1%	17.6%
Third Last	2.2%	19.1%
Bottom	2.2%	21.3%